Neighbors
56% of American adults believe China threatens U.S. influence in Central
and South America
As the U.S. struggles with a sagging public image in many Latin American
countries, American adults show a stunning ignorance about the region, a
new Zogby Interactive poll shows.
Only 10% of online poll respondents said they were familiar with Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva, the second-term president of Brazil, South
America's largest country. And just 20% were familiar with Felipe
Calderon, the President of Mexico, who was elected last summer in an
extremely close race that captured global headlines.
The Zogby Interactive poll included 7,362 adults nationwide and was
conducted July 27–30, 2007. It carries a margin of error of +/– 1.2
percentage points.
Asked which Latin American countries are the biggest allies to the U.S.,
Mexico is seen as the top ally, while Brazil is seen as a close second.
Costa Rica is seen as the third greatest ally of the U.S. Asked which
countries in the region are least friendly to the U.S., Venezuela and
Cuba predictably topped the list. But Americans listed Colombia—which
has been the U.S.'s closest ally in the past decade—as a distant third.
"The poll suggests that American adults are badly misinformed about the
region," said Peter Hakim, the president of the Inter-American Dialogue,
a Washington think tank that collaborated with Zogby on the poll. "Most
Americans believe Brazil and Mexico are the U.S.'s best friends in the
region, but the great majority cannot identify the president of either
country, and they mistakenly identify Washington's closest ally in the
region, Colombia, as an adversary," Hakim noted. "While US citizens
identify two familiar adversaries in Latin America as Cuba and
Venezuela, they do not know much about their friends," said Hakim.
The Bush Administration considers Colombia one of its staunchest allies
in the region, backing Plan Colombia with more than a half-billion
dollars per year for its anti-drug, anti-guerrilla campaign. Colombia
gets more foreign aid than any other country in the world outside the
Middle East/Afghanistan arc.
More than half – 56% – said they believe China's increased involvement
in Latin America represents a serious threat to American influence
there. Among those respondents who identify themselves as most
politically liberal, 48% said China's increased involvement in the
region represented a serious threat to the U.S., but the most
conservative respondents were much more concerned – 76% said China's
activity was a serious threat to America. Just 10% said such involvement
by China posed little or no threat at all to the U.S. role there.
"The poll results on China suggest a huge gap between U.S. public
perception and reality," Hakim said. "Among the range of issues that are
meaningful to U.S.-Latin America relations and to the region's economic
vitality, I must say that China, as a threat to the U.S. in our own
hemisphere, does not rise to the top of the list," Hakim said. "China's
involvement with Latin America, although increasing, simply cannot
compare to long-standing commercial, political, and social ties that
Latin America has had with the U.S. and Europe. Any threat from China is
among the lower-priority worries the U.S. faces in the region," he
added. "Indeed, many observers believe that Chinese involvement in Latin
America will, in the end, benefit all parties—the U.S., Latin America,
and China," Hakim said.
The wide–ranging survey about Latin American issues also showed that
majorities of American adults believed it is time for the U.S. to open
negotiations with Raul Castro, the stand–in Cuban president for brother
Fidel, in an effort to improve relations between the two countries.
While 58% felt the two countries should be talking about their future
relationship, 56% said it is time for the U.S. to remove the travel
restrictions on Cuba and to end the economic embargo against the island
nation that sits just 90 miles south of Florida.
One in four American adults (26%) gave President Bush positive job
approval marks specifically for his handling of U.S. relations with
Latin America. Just 29% said they think the Bush administration has done
an adequate job of focusing on Latin American issues and building
stronger relationships with the region, while 60% disagreed with that
statement.
A majority – 55% – said they believe the American economy benefits from
migrant workers from Latin America, while 48% said the U.S. should
pursue more free trade agreements with Latin American nations. One in
three U.S. adults disagreed, however, saying they do not believe the
U.S. should pursue more free trade agreements with southern neighbors.
The American public's view of one well-known trade agreement in
particular, NAFTA, might be the reason for lack of support for new trade
agreements in the region. A substantial plurality (48%) believe that, of
the three nations involved in the North America Free Trade
Agreement—Canada, the U.S., and Mexico—the U.S. has been most harmed by
NAFTA, which was signed into law by President Clinton in the 1990s. Just
3% said they think Canada has been most harmed, while 12% said they
think Mexico has gotten the short end of the stick. Conversely,
respondents, by a three-to-one margin, believe Mexico has been a bigger
beneficiary than the U.S. under the trade agreement.
"The poll results reveal that U.S. public opinion is totally confused
about what's going on with trade," Hakim said. "The American public even
seems to be contradicting itself in some of the results. How can so many
Americans believe that the U.S. has been harmed by NAFTA—while nearly
half call for new trade agreements," he said.
For a complete methodological statement on this survey, please visit:
http://www.zogby.com/methodology/readmeth.dbm?ID=1205
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1346
No comments:
Post a Comment